US pediatrician on trial for raping toddlers

Earl Bradley has pleaded not guilty to 24 counts against him, and sat quietly in gray prison scrubs as a veteran state trooper spent hours Tuesday describing the doctor\'s cache of home videos of the assaults.

They were so "horrible," testified state police detective Scott Garland, a specialist in forensic computer evidence. "They were beyond anything I had ever witnessed. Nothing prepared me for it."

Families of some victims were in the courtroom, and Garland\'s graphic descriptions elicited muffled sobs, while a few hurried out in anguish.

Superior Court Judge William Carpenter presided over the one-day bench trial in southern Delaware where Bradley, who was married with four children, had a practice from 1994 until he was arrested and jailed in December 2009.

His once popular Disney-themed office compound in Lewes, where he taped his alleged assaults for 10 years, went to auction but with no takers. The toys he once used to quiet crying children were burned by the state rather than sold.

Bradley\'s attorneys argue the video evidence taken from his offices was seized without a proper warrant and violated Bradley\'s constitutional rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Judge Carpenter denied the defense attorney\'s motion to suppress, or throw out the evidence, and the trial became just a step on the way to an appeal.

There was no cross examination of the state\'s two police witnesses, no evidence from the defense, and no closing arguments.

When the judge offered Bradley an opportunity to speak, the doctor made his longest statement of the day, saying: "I decided not to testify."

Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, son of US Vice President Joe Biden, watched the trial and conferred with prosecutors.

Because of a court gag order in place, Biden told AFP he could not talk about the trial until after there is a verdict.

The judge said he will rule after reviewing 13 hours of video evidence. If Bradley is found guilty, his attorneys will implement their defense in an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court raising the claim of a warrantless search.

Bradley faces a life sentence, but observer and criminal defense lawyer John Malik said his best chance would be if the Supreme Court declares the evidence, however painstakingly catalogued, inadmissible because it was illegally seized.

"The Delaware Constitution affords Delaware defendants greater privacy rights than even the US Constitutition," Malik said.

© Copyright AFP Agence France-Presse GmbH - All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. All reproduction or redistribution is expressly forbidden without the prior written agreement of AFP.